Prediction of Rhett Purcell vs Sam Matheson Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Purcell vs S. Matheson

Rhett Purcell
GBR
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
29
Age
31
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
749
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$755
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Sam Matheson
NZL
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
29
Age
31
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
749
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$755
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Purcell 0 - 1 Matheson
They have played 3 sets in total, with Rhett Purcell winning 1 and Sam Matheson winning 2. The last match between Sam Matheson and Rhett Purcell was at the Vietnam F8, 26-10-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Sam Matheson getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Purcell | 0 |
| Matheson | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Vietnam F8(10-26-16)
Sam Matheson
3
6
6
Rhett Purcell
6
1
4
R. Purcell vs S. Matheson H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $755 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.17% (109-96) | Career Total W/L | 53.70% (29-25) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Purcell vs S. Matheson Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rhett Purcell has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Sam Matheson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rhett Purcell, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sam Matheson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rhett Purcell has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sam Matheson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rhett Purcell has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Sam Matheson winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rhett Purcell has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 34/18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 4/5). Sam Matheson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 27/24).
- Player level: In the last year, Rhett Purcell has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Sam Matheson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rhett Purcell winning 0 times and Sam Matheson being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Rhett Purcell winning 1 and Sam Matheson winning 2.
- The last match between Rhett Purcell and Sam Matheson was at the Vietnam F8, 26-10-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Sam Matheson getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rhett Purcell has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Sam Matheson has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rhett Purcell has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sam Matheson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rhett Purcell has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sam Matheson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Rhett Purcell vs Sam Matheson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Purcell vs S. Matheson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 11 | Games Won | 15 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:52:0 | Average Match Time | 1:52:0 |
| 65% (58/89) | 1st Serve % | 53% (38/72) |
| 69% (40/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (27/38) |
| 35% (11/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 65% (22/34) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (4/12) |
| 32% (23/72) | Return Points Win % | 43% (38/89) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Purcell 0%, Matheson 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Purcell 0%, Matheson 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Purcell 0%, Matheson 0%.
R. Purcell Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-6(10) 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | ||
S. Matheson Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||

R. Purcell vs S. Matheson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.17% (109/96) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.70% (29/25) |
| 53.30% (242/212) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.54% (62/56) |
| 51.27% (2144/2038) | Games Win/Loss | 51.57% (557/523) |
| 49.28% (68/70) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.94% (27/24) |
| 65.38% (34/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 335 | Aces Total | 11 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 452 | Total Double Faults | 17 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 409.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 266.96 |
| 62% (4584/7413) | 1st Serve % | 61% (301/494) |
| 67% (3054/4584) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (187/301) |
| 46% (1306/2829) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (89/193) |
| 38% (234/621) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (10/33) |
| 36% (2638/7234) | Return Points Win % | 29% (131/452) |
| 100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54.12% (105/89) | Futures W/L | 54.72% (29/24) |
| 53% (107/202) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (28/53) |
| 46% (24/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
| 45% (21/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (6/11) |
| 87% (113/98) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (30/25) |
| 13% (113/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (30/5) |
| 12% (92/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (24/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Fri, 21 Nov, 06:30 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 05:00 AM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 07:30 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 04:05 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 08:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 09:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
Top Predictions Today
04:10
H2H 1-1
20:00
H2H 0-1
17:00
H2H 0-0
18:30
H2H 0-0
18:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal